Why configured Inmovilla websites scored lower in this Lighthouse comparison

An agency can continue managing property information and commercial work in Inmovilla. The same authorised portfolio can be shared with property portals such as Idealista and Fotocasa, subject to the connections available in the agency's account. A custom website can become another public destination for that portfolio without creating a second catalogue for the team to maintain.

Unlike a property portal, the agency website belongs to the agency's own brand. It can explain how the team serves buyers and owners, present properties in its own way and provide enquiry routes shaped around the business. Inmovilla stays central to the workflow while the public website has a different role.

The search fields, listing controls and contact forms follow the same component structure across the examples. Property type, area, price range, reference and map selection appear in the same sequence. Listing pages repeat the alerts, publish a property, viewed, excluded and favourites controls, while the contact forms use the same field order and consent layout.

One example uses the compact horizontal search bar on desktop while the others show the expanded stacked version. These are different presentations of the same underlying search structure. The main visual changes come from colour, background imagery and the agency branding around those components.

They support a narrower observation. The configured websites share a recognisably related starting structure, and much of their immediately visible distinction comes from the agency branding and colours applied to it.